• From: Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:12:55 -0500

-----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:52 AM
> To: xml-dev
> Subject: Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)

> Do I detect that, despite a year passing since SML managed
> to divert a lot of high-quality people's attentions from Schemas,
> people are still madly keen to ignore the things they can
> change and fart around with things they cannot.

This intrigues me, but I'm confused:  What can be changed, what cannot, and
what does this have to do with "SML" and Schemas?  If I missed an
elaboration somewhere, I'm sorry .. I was travelling yesterday.

• Prev by Date: RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
• Next by Date: Re: Relative Namespaces
• Previous by thread: virgin xml user
• Next by thread: Re: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread