• From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:07:01 -0500

At 08:55 AM 3/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote -
>> > Why have any markup at all?
>>
>Exactly.  But the again, the data-oriented people are saying that you still
>won't how to interpret the data without a schema, even with markup in the data document.  If that is so, it's not a strong case for using markup.

It is the markup that relates raw data to the appropriate part of the schema.

The markup is a critical piece of data typing in XML.

take it easy,
Charles Reitzel



take it easy,
Charles Reitzel

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@l...>

• References:
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
  • Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: typing (was RE: Personal reply)
• Next by Date: Re: advocating XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread