• From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>
• To: XML Developers' List <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:57:55 -0500

> I'd suggest taking a closer look at _how_ those specs have adopted XML
> Schema Datatypes.  RELAX, for example, supports only built-in data types,
> and identifies them _without_ the use of namespace prefixes - "string"
> instead of "xsd:string".

The datatypes are identified in the PSVI by a URI. It doesn't matter what
QName an implementation uses as long as they have the same semantics as a
Schema datatype and the proper URI is generated for the PSVI.

David Cleary
Progress Software

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: Can XPointers be used as a name (was Re: RDDL for names ?(was Re:XMLSchema built-in data typenamespaceURI.))
• Previous by thread: RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread