Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...> writes:
> From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@c...>
> >Too late to use this as a banner to rally the troops behind, we've
> >already done it :-)! This is _precisely_ how the XML Schema
> >architecture is specified:
> >
> > 1) Start with an XML+Namespaces compliant parser output (need _not_
> > be validating, but _may_ be);
> > 2) Specify what schemas are to be involved _outside_ the instance;
> > 3) _Augment_ the Infoset.
>
> Perhaps the last could be split too--
> 3) determine the type of the data and augment the infoset with type info
> 4) validate the data and augment the infoset with outcomes
I think to claim to do so would be at best misleading -- you _can't_
assign types without knowing that higher (in the tree) type
assignments were correct, i.e. local validation and type-assigment go
hand in hand. Perhaps I've missed something.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
|
