• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 00:55:25 +0800

From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>

>Why not XPath -> WF XML and then a SAX API for it just drops out?

I think this is a great idea.  Explore how far we can go with specialized
SAX pipelines and little-languages based on pushing SAX processors onto a
stream stack.

Let the dead bury the Post-schema validated!

Horribly enough, an XML Schema processor could probably be written in this
way too: XML Schemas is now streamable and I guess the PSVI could be passed
on as PIs or some other structure currently unknown.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Prev by Date: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Next by Date: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Previous by thread: Re: We need an XPath API
• Next by thread: Re: We need an XPath API
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread