[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > The main reason for leaving it out of XML is that it causes authoring > problems: it fails the test of least surprise as NEL above. Least surprising to whom? The fact that some systems expect to use bare CR and bare LF is probably very surprising to parochial Windows programmers, which render them as blocks. Should they be disallowed? -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
|

Cart



