• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:57:11 -0600

Hmm.  Interesting, Rick.  I'd like to drag this 
idea over to the HumanML list and see what 
they say.   The problem of object model 
and language binding is emerging over there 
as it usually does whenever multiple 
applications are built that use the same 
language.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:08 AM
To: xml-dev
Subject: ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE:
Datatypes vs anarchy))


From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@i...>

>So what you are suggesting looks right,

Probably I should be a bit more concrete.  I attach a little draft of a spec
for an ER schema language, showing the kind of thing I would be thinking of.
(The thing missing is the construction of built-in valueSets to act as
datatypes.) Just a rough sketch.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Prev by Date: Re: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll)
• Next by Date: Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples
• Previous by thread: RE: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll)
• Next by thread: RE: Who knows?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread