• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 11:33:27 +0000

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> writes:

<snip/>

> Before we lament the complexity (We are whining!) 
> or really sidetrack, we can stop and 
> look at the path we came down (you did 
> that in the speech) and then see if the 
> next steps are obvious or not obvious.
> 
> Can we safely say:
> 
> 1. If it fails the parse, it isn't 
> XML (draconian bases).

Yes.

> 2. The base infoSet maps to the 
> first level.

Yes (including Namespaces).

> 3.  Each step afterwards is one 
> one has to choose.  XML Schema 
> is an obvious step because it adds 
> type information. 

Yes.

> What alternative steps for three are there 
> other than the DTD?  What alternative properties 
> are added in these steps?  Then we can 
> get around to naming the steps.

Gentlefolk, start your engines.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: is that a fork in the road?
    • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>

• References:
  • RE: is that a fork in the road?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI
• Next by Date: Re: is that a fork in the road?
• Previous by thread: Call for participation for XML DevCon Fall 2001, SQL Summit,Web Servies Summit (October 29-November 1)
• Next by thread: Re: is that a fork in the road?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread