• From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>
• To: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 16:47:58 +0100

At 00:10 02/03/2001 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
>Hmm.  What do you think of...
>[snip very interesting xbind example]

I think it's great ! It's true that RDDL might not be powerful enough to
provide all that could be required for an extension, this really would help.

<xbind:param name="date" type="string" /> and <xbind:return type="string"
/> would need to accept more than just the XPath types in order to work
with extension objects (already in the spec). We need a simple way to
specify extra types.

Do you think something similar could be achieved for extension elements ?

-- robin b.
"Many people would sooner die than think. In fact, they do." - Bertrand
Russell 

• References:
  • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>
  • Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>

• Prev by Date: XML Meta-Architecture (Technetcast program of Henry Thompson keynote)
• Next by Date: RE: PSVI
• Previous by thread: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread