• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:20:42 -0500

> I think there should be a standard way to 
> normalize a DOM tree so that CDATASection 
> nodes disappear.

While I can see that value in this, I have a
question...

Given that the DOM allows adjacent Text nodes unless
normalise() is called, and CDATASection nodes extend 
the interfaces of Text, how would your processing
change if you just dealt with Text alone?

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
    • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
    • From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@l...>

• References:
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
    • From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: humility (was RE: experts)
• Next by Date: more namespace abuse
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Next by thread: RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread