• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:37:20 -0500

> Be that as it may, it could be argued quite easily that the W3C as it
> currently stands is neither fast nor open. I wouldn't label the
> contributions of W3C advocates to this type of discussion as universally
> personal attacks or deprecation of other people's work, but one
> thing that I have definitely never seen is any indication whatsoever
> that the constant stream of dissatisfaction expressed by many parties has
> translated into even the slightest willingness among the W3C
powers-that-be to
> consider that some changes might be apt, let alone any action in this
direction.

I think the W3C has generally tried to do what is most appropriate.

It may not be obvious, but in general, I think the W3C process plays
second fiddle to "doing what's right" for most WG's.

• References:
  • RE: Web Philosophy
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Next by Date: RE: experts
• Previous by thread: RE: Web Philosophy
• Next by thread: RE: Web Philosophy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread