• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>, Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:49:57 -0500

At 12:12 PM 3/27/01, Ronald Bourret wrote:

>(a) are well enough known to get invited,
>(b) have enough time to contribute at the level of a WG member,
>(c) have enough money to attend (flight, hotel, etc.) the WG meetings.
>
>(a) cuts out most of the world and (b) and (c) cut out most of the
>remaining people.
>
>I'm not saying anything about whether the W3C is open or closed -- just
>that I'm tired of hearing the "invited expert" argument as a reasonable
>route to allow non-W3C members to participate.

Ok, but if you don't have (b) and (c) available, how do you expect to be 
able to participate? At what level?

Ann
Chief Geek, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
Now in print! XHTML By Example
http://www.webgeek.com/books/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Web Philosophy
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: XNS (eXtensible Name Service)
• Next by Date: RE: Web Philosophy
• Previous by thread: Re: Web Philosophy
• Next by thread: Re: Web Philosophy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread