Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> > As a result, I remain a vocal critic of W3C process and of many of its > > results - making noise may irritate people, but staying silent only (IMHO) > > makes things worse. [my suggestion to participate omitted] > Sorry - protesting the manner in which a process is conducted by > participating in it is not an answer in my book. > > Vendor consortia with closed processes are not appropriate means of > building the Web, in my opinion. Now I understand. You are not (primarily) criticizing the technical results that they get, but the process by which they obtain them. > That might seem quaint, nostalgic, or naive to some people, but I > think it's a pretty reasonable, even moderate, stance. I think it is confusing that you apparently disagree with the results based on the process in which they've been produced. While I can understand the criticism, I'd agree it is naïve to assume that anything will likely change in that respect in foreseeable future. Furthermore, I cannot agree that the process is closed - nor do I see reasonable alternatives. Regards, Martin
|
