• From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@l...>
• To: simonstl@s...
• Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:45:14 +0200

> Unfortunately, at least for those of us who aren't building closed systems, 
> ignoring the W3C completely is impossible and ignoring the parts we don't 
> like is extremely difficult at best.
> 
> As a result, I remain a vocal critic of W3C process and of many of its 
> results - making noise may irritate people, but staying silent only (IMHO) 
> makes things worse.

There is, of course, another alternative: For those results that you
are interested in, participate in the process of defining the
recommendations.

Regards,
Martin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: Ken North <ken_north@c...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: david barnes <d.d.barnes@i...>
  • RE: Web Philosophy
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@m...>
  • Re: Web Philosophy
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Combining float/string to specify value/units
• Next by Date: Re: Web Philosophy
• Previous by thread: Re: Web Philosophy
• Next by thread: Re: Web Philosophy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread