• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:57:17 +0700

AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:

> "XSLT is also designed to be used independently of XSL." ... cannot
> be true if XSL = XSL-FO + XSLT (XSLT cannot be used
> independently of  "XSL" since XSLT is _part of_ "XSL")

I don't follow your logic here.  I see no contradiction between saying

- XSLT can be used independently of XSL, and
- XSL is the combination of XSLT and XSL-FO

James

• References:
  • Can we achieve clarity at W3C re what XSL, XSL-FO and XSLT are?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: SAX2 parser abort
• Next by Date: Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples
• Previous by thread: Can we achieve clarity at W3C re what XSL, XSL-FO and XSLT are?
• Next by thread: Re: Can we achieve clarity at W3C re what XSL, XSL-FO and XSLT are?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread