Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Paul T wrote: > You have used XSLT as a general purpose language. There are some > people who do that. They do that for fun, I think, because those who > have real-life experience in maintaining XSLT systems should know > that it eventually turns into nightmare. For many reasons. Most of > the reasons why XSL programming is harmful, have been explained by > Mr. Leventhal 2 years ago (and I admit that at that point of time I > was blind enough not to understand what he was talking about.) Do you have a pointer to Mr. Leventhal's explanation? > Not only you'd write this set of converters faster ( because you be > using a general-purpose language *which xslt is not* ), but what you > produce will be *correct* , easy to *debug* and *really* > error-prone. You didn't really mean what you just wrote, did you? -- Bob Kline mailto:bkline@r... http://www.rksystems.com
|
