• From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...>
• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:00:43 +1100

Michael Brennan wrote:

> Unfortunately, there are many implementors who will heed your advice. I have
> so far identified only a few implementations of XML Schema. Each is focused
> on one very narrow use case (typically validation) and each supports only a
> subset of the spec. Will this situation get better or worse? I hope it gets
> better, but I'm not sure.

So, are you saying that validation is just a very narrow use case of XML Schema?
I was under the impression that this was the major use case for them. I
understand that you can do other things but I wouldn't say that validation is a
very narrow use case. However, I'd love to hear more information about what
other use cases you have in mind.

Cheers,
/Eddie

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>

• Prev by Date: PyTREX 0.5.0 released
• Next by Date: Re: <xinclude> & unimplementable specs
• Previous by thread: RE: Alternatives to XML Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread