[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jeff Rafter asked - > Also to clarify-- is Tim saying that the following is pointless because it > equates to a prefixed name being treated as a non namespace name or is he > saying that the document is in error wrt to namespaces because the prefix > can not logically be resolved? > > <foo:bar xmlns:foo="http://foo.com"> > <foo:baz xmlns:foo=""/> > </foo:bar> > I think that this is a way to have the foo:baz element have no namespace rather than that of its parent. How else could you indicate that, if an empty string were different from no namespace? Cheers, Tom P
|

Cart



