• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>,"XML-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 10:01:18 -0800

>>The rest of the world doesn't care, but they like the free headlines and
links

True.

Otherwise, I see some of the reasons people want RDF, and I've heard from
people saying that RSS is just what RDF needs, but sheez there are a lot of
people who like RSS and don't care a bit about RDF. Don't think it's just
me, it's not. Can't we have a simple format without always having to explain
why RDF is too much? Oyy. Anyway, have  a great day, I'm off to SOAP-land
for the remainder.

Dave

• References:
  • Since XML.Com is unbiased
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
  • Re: Since XML.Com is unbiased
    • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
  • RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
  • Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fw: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Next by Date: Re: Fw: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Previous by thread: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Next by thread: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread