Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Thomas B. Passin" wrote: > > Steve Rosenberry asked - > > > > > > As for the RE pattern, any ideas where I can find one already defined > > for a float number? Despite my previous assertion of an application > > fully under my control, I'd like to make sure my patterns match the > > official XML Schema functionality as much as possible including the INF, > > NaN, and the exponential notations. > > Look in the Schema Datatypes Proposed Rec at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#float > ... > > Start by hitting the "pattern" link and you will be led to the RE notation > they use. It's expressed in BN form. > Been there, done that! I've also checked the XML Schema schema at: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema but none of these documents actually has the RE that defines a string as a valid float value that I was hoping to copy (at least not that I could find). Is the validation of primitive datatypes built into validators and not dependent upon a second XML Schema declaration? -- Steve Rosenberry Sr. Partner Electronic Solutions Company -- For the Home of Integration http://ElectronicSolutionsCo.com http://BetterGoBids.com -- The Premier GoTo Bid Management Tool (610) 670-1710
|
