[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
  • To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@x...
  • Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:07:39 -0500

> My point is slightly different. Two very different schema 
> languages may have schemas that accept the same files without
> complaint: but that is only one aspect of a schema language 
> and it may not even be the most important one.

I would agree with this. While you can say that C++, JAVA, and
BASIC are all equivalent on a given processor (they all execute
the native instructions eventually), they present a very
different view of the world to a user.

I think the schema language model, and more importantly, the
users perception of it, are at least very significant factors for 
application within a given domain. In human interface design 
principals, this is called the "system image" and the 
"user image".


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member