• From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:26:31 +0100

At 20:25 29/03/2001 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>
>But that means you are *not* interested in the information set of the
>document, but the actual text of the document's entities. That is a fine
>thing.  Let there be element-based (infoset) editors and entity-based
>(tag-aware) editors.

I thought that was exactly what I'd said when I wrote

>It's just that some applications need to operate directly on the 
>representation, and not just on the information.

Do we disagree?

-- 
Cheers,
John

• References:
  • Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF Schema and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
• Next by Date: Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Previous by thread: Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models
• Next by thread: Re: Syntax Sugar and XML information models
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread