• From: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@h...>
• To: warped_user@y..., xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:26:37 -0800

Your understanding is correct.

Stuff in the XML Rec. that starts with "For interoperability" is routinely 
and harmlessly ignored. It's just a reminder that legacy SGML systems might 
choke on this.

-Wayne Steele

>From: Richard Knapp <warped_user@y...>
>Reply-To: Richard Knapp <warped_user@y...>
>To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
>Subject: Attributes and enumerations
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:12:28 -0500 (EST)
>
>In 3.3.1 of the 6 Oct, 2000 spec there is a line (bottom of page 27) 
>saying:
>
>	"For interoperatibility, the same Nmtoken should not occur more than once 
>in the enumerated
>attribute types of a single element."
>
>Does this mean I can't do the following?
>
><!ATTLIST Options
>	Color (Yes | No) "No"
>	Bold (Yes | No) "No"
>	Italic (Yes | No) "No">
>
>or am I misunderstanding the meaning of 'element'?
>
>	- Richard
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

• Prev by Date: Re: is there equivalent of unique-identifier datatype in XMLSchemaDatatypes ?
• Next by Date: RE: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples
• Previous by thread: Re: Attributes and enumerations
• Next by thread: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread