• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 16:31:05 -0500

At 11:50 AM 3/6/2001 -0600, Len Bullard wrote:
>So your first proposal
>to solve the type problem involves using a different
>syntax (not XML parsable, so not XML) to
>create something akin to architectural forms
>thus breaking the tie to XML by tieing it to CSS.

Thanks, Len, but that was just a quick sample of what's possible, not a 
concrete proposal to use CSS syntax for typing. (Note that I specified ad 
hoc, typing over a 7.2bps connection.)

The point is not the syntax, it's the painting.

Simon St.Laurent
Associate Editor
O'Reilly and Associates

• Prev by Date: Architecture (was Re: Alternatives to XML Schemas)
• Next by Date: XSet: an update
• Previous by thread: RE: painting types
• Next by thread: RE: painting types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread