• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 19:29:29 +0000

> At 05:38 PM 01/03/01 +0000, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> > The PSVI is the true Infoset that really meets those 80/20 requirements.
>
> Of course the great risk in this kind of thinking is that you
> start to believe that in general you have to apply a schema
> before you can start to do useful work with a chunk of XML.

Exactly. I've not found a need for data typing in my applications
yet, but then I'm mostly in a document processing environment.

As I said, I don't necessarily agree that with the proposition,
I'd just like this assumption (PSVI == Primary/Core Infoset) documented
if that is the case.

Perhaps its not. And if not, then lets see this stressed somehow (as
Jonathan Borden notes wrt to typing).

Cheers,

L.


--
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect       | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• References:
  • PSVI
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Next by Date: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist
• Previous by thread: Re: PSVI
• Next by thread: re: PSVI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread