• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:17:37 -0500

Simon St.Laurent wrote:


> So why do we have CDATA sections at all?
> 
> Oh, never mind.

I'll answer anyway.

They add to human readability in special cases of embedded text,
where the text contains frequent occurrences of "<" or "&" or both,
and is known not to contain "]]>".

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
    • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@m...>

• References:
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
  • Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Next by Date: Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Next by thread: Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread