• From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
• To: Paul T <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:18:28 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Paul T wrote:

> > > Not only you'd write this set of converters faster ( because you be
> > > using a general-purpose language *which xslt is not* ), but what you
> > > produce will be *correct* , easy to *debug* and *really*
> > > error-prone.
> > 
> > You didn't really mean what you just wrote, did you?
> 
> ?
> 
> What point you disagree with ?

I'm having a hard time understanding why you appear to be advocating the
use of an approach which you describe as "*really* error-prone."

-- 
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline@r...
http://www.rksystems.com

• References:
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: Paul T <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
• Next by Date: RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
• Previous by thread: Re: advocating XML
• Next by thread: Re: advocating XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread