Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: W. E. Perry <wperry@f...> >I am merely suggesting >that the recipient be permitted to proceed directly from the XML syntax as >received to the locally meaningful instantiation of locally useful data, by >whatever means are locally at his disposal. In this regard, I note that Schematron 1.5 assertion language has a facility "phases" which allows you to group and select the various patterns than are active. So validation/transformation at the client-side can be different that at the server-side, but expressed in the same schema. Or so that, as data goes through a workflow being incrementally altered, it can have the assertions made that are proper to each stage. If you want dynamic, instance-driven schemas making full use of the document's graph, rather than static, tree- or stream-limited ones, you can check out Schematron at http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
