• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <k-kawa@b...>
• Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 17:18:22 +0000

Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <k-kawa@b...> writes:

> > W3C XML Schema doesn't support this, true.  I'm not a RELAX expert,
> > but I don't it does either.
> 
>   RELAX can handle this in this way.
> 
> 
> <elementRule label="foo">
>   <tag name="foo">
>     <attribute name="class">
>       <enumeration value="abc" />
>     </attribute>
>   </tag>
> 
>   ... content model for <foo class="abc"> ...
> </elementRule>
> 
> 
> 
> <elementRule label="foo">
>   <tag name="foo">
>     <attribute name="class">
>       <enumeration value="def" />
>     </attribute>
>   </tag>
> 
>   ... content model for <foo class="def"> ...
> </elementRule>

Thanks, I stand corrected.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• References:
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
    • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <k-kawa@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: more grist
• Next by Date: Fw: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9*
• Previous by thread: Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Next by thread: Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread