[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> Perhaps what we need for a schema language is something along the lines of > <schema> > <conceptual-model> > ... > </conceptual-model> > <language-binding> > ... > </language-binding> > </schema> Not a bad idea... bind a taxonomy or ontology onto a language binding. It would take reasoning/arguing about intended semantics one level higher into the metaphysical instead of the merely physical. Of course, this is closely related to machine translation, etc.etc.
|

Cart



