• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:53:15 -0600

The web succeeded based on a standard set of 
generic codes passed among communicating parties 
via a standard protocol all implemented over 
a code library made freely available from 
the originators of that code.

There isn't a hint of anarchy in that. 

Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

How much anarchy can your systems tolerate?

I'd suggest that anarchy is a lot of why the Web succeeded and previous 
approaches failed.  Seems to be a matter of balancing structure and chaos, 
not banishing disagreements.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
• Next by Date: XML Schema restriction contradiction?
• Previous by thread: RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
• Next by thread: RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread