[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Brian Miller <brian_n_miller@y...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:20:45 -0800 (PST)

"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...> wrote:
>
> I've put the talk up online (fat: Powerpoint gifs 
> inside HTML) at
>
http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/XML_MetaArchitecture.html

Thanks.  That was nifty overview for a newby like 
me.

I notice a seeming contradiction between slide 9 which
says:

"If a document isn?t well-formed, or is invalid, or 
isn?t Namespace-conformant -- It doesn?t have an 
Infoset"

and slide 13 which says:

"XSLT will properly be understood as mapping from one
Infoset to another".

If a stylesheet emits PostScript, then surely its
XSLT can't be thought of as a mapping between
infosets.

A hypothetical alternative to XSLT which only mapped
infosets would surely be safer and faster than XSLT.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member