• From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@b...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:34:42 -0800

just FYI,

the sequence of "a c a b b b b" satisifies all of your rules, but is
invalid compared to your original grammar.


I still can't understand what you were tring to show by your example...


regards,
----------------------
K.Kawaguchi
E-Mail: k-kawa@b...

• References:
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • (slight correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Type-assignment in one pass
• Next by Date: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?)
• Previous by thread: (slight correction) Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by thread: Type-assignment (was Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread