Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 09:49 16/02/2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > There is nothing that requires a DOM tree to be held in memory other > > than the DOM implementation itself. Lazy DOMs allow you to > > incrementally retrieve and traverse DOM trees, I believe the Xerces > > project was working on such a beast, and the dbXML DOM is partially a > > lazy DOM. > >Yep. 4Suite's DbDom is also a lazy DOM. I agree that the claims quoted >from the article are disingenuous. Is it not true, however, that for applications such as XSLT, almost all of the DOM would end up loaded in memory? In my understanding, lazy DOMs only save memory if many of the nodes are not accessed at all. Is this the case? J ------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@s...
|
