• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:09:24 +1100

At 04:37 28/02/2001, Frank Richards wrote:

>The corporations of the w3c come up with (hopefully) comprehensive, well
>defined, but 'make it work' oriented 'recommendations'.

And what do we (the punters) do if it "doesn't work"?

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: Frank Richards <frichards@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: Frank Richards <frichards@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Next by Date: Re: client side XML (was The relentless march of abstraction)
• Previous by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Next by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread