• From: Jim Shain <Jim.Shain@a...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:22 -0600

I wanted to run this past some knowledgeable people.  Is the following a legal
or illegal construct for an element in a DTD?

 <!ELEMENT Request ((A, B, C?) | (A?, B, C?, D))>

Some have stated that it is illegal because "When A is present it isn't possible
to determine whether or not D is required."

Jim Shain
Sr. C/S Architect
ALLTEL Information Services

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
    • From: Dan Vint <dvint@s...>
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
    • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources?
• Previous by thread: Re: xml 2 postscript
• Next by thread: Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread