• From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@i...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 17:26:44 +0100

  Happy New Year,

For those wondering why XPointer wasn't granted Proposed
Recommendation status, the reason an be found in the
publication of a second XPointer Last Call Working Draft:

    - XML Pointer Language (XPointer) Version 1.0
      W3C Last Call Working Draft 8 January 2001
      http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108/

  This second Last Call has been made necessary by a change required
to XPointer to insure that URI References built using XPointer are
context independant. This specific addition is detailed in section 5.2.1
of this XPointer Working Draft.

   http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108/#ns-context

The Last Call review period ends 29 January 2001. Please send review
comments before that date to www-xml-linking-comments@w...
(archives [1]).


Daniel Veillard

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
daniel@v...  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN]: SIX)
• Previous by thread: RE: [ANN]: SIX
• Next by thread: Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread