• From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@c...>
• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:53:11 -0500

"Thomas B. Passin" wrote:
> Linda<->RDF intersection - yes, very interesting!

FWIW, the HTTP protocol defines a tuple-space model.  POST = add/insert,
GET = read, GET/DELETE = non-atomic take.

Tuple-matching can be achieved by using GET and specifying a query over
a persistent HTTP 1.1 connection, though that's more general than your
typical notify semantic.

And yes, HTTP + RDF = interesting.

MB

• References:
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
    • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@i...>
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAXincomparison to Schemas?
• Next by Date: RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
• Previous by thread: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
• Next by thread: RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread