• From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@b...>
• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:02:33 -0800

Probably I have to explain what I meant by saying "assistance of the
interpretation".
In your example, you used schema to establish "equivalencies between
vocabularies", but it's not what I intended at all.

Yes, one can abuse schema as you described, but you can't conclude that
"AoI" is useless or danger simply because it can be abused.

For example, we have a tool "relaxer", which automatically generates
an object model from RELAX grammar. This can't be done if you abandon
"AoI" in schema (or in other words, if you reject the concept of
"type-assignment").


regards,
----------------------
K.Kawaguchi
E-Mail: k-kawa@b...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
    • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@b...>
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
• Next by Date: RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
• Previous by thread: RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by thread: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread