Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 09:28:13AM -0500, Thomas B. Passin wrote: > This doesn't say what "Documentation" consists of. How about someone writes > up some boiler plate in hideous marketing type language - generic hype that > says almost nothing. Every time anyone puts out a product that might be a > "modification" of XPointer, no matter how trivial or even if it is alpha, fill > in a few blanks in the boilerplate and send it to W3C. > > They might get sick of receiving and tracking all the junk, and the letter of > this section would be followed with small effort. Maybe that would give them > the idea not to go this route again! Please note that the wording you are criticizing comes from Sun, not W3C. Even I wouldn't know what and where to send the informations concerning libxml implementation of XPointer ! Talking to Eve, and if I remember correctly, having the documentation/source freely available was sufficient. Now if this not the case, I don't know either. As Eve wrote http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200101/msg00377.html: > Note that comments on the terms should be sent to me and to Marc Foodman > (ipman@e...) to ensure that we see them all; you can copy > patent-issues@w... if you wish. So I'm forwarding this comment there, feel free to send them a mail directly Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ daniel@v... | libxml Gnome XML toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
|
