• From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• To: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 22:30:21 +0000

> Either way, I'm enormously happy to see this
> activity underway.

As we can tell; thanks for running http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=974

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

• References:
  • Namespace or document gloss?
    • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>
  • Re: Namespace or document gloss?
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace or document gloss?
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace or document gloss?
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace or document gloss?
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace or document gloss?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread