• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:06:51 -0500

>
> P.S. If anyone knows any good website on term rewriting that list
> rules for
> regular expressions -> paths of some kind, I would be very interested.
>

	How about defining a boolean extension function regexp-match(pattern,path)
and when the second param is ommitted it defaults to ".". I've thought this
would be a good candidate for XPath 1.1 or XPointer or somesuch.

-Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by Date: Re: [RDDL] Java Object Model
• Previous by thread: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by thread: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread