• From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@i...>
• To: abrahams@a...
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:20:41 +0100

On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:12:29PM -0500, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
> Seems to me that by the statement "XPointer is affected by a
> technology patent held by Sun Microsystems.", the XPointer
> spec is assuming the validity of the patent.   Couldn't W3C
> cover its backside without endorsing the patent by replacing
> "is" by "might be"?

  Yes, that's a problem, I don't think W3C did intent to endorse
the patent validity, but unfortunately the text signaling the claim
seems to present it as accepted. I'm pretty sure this will be 
corrected.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
daniel@v...  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPointer and Sun patent
    • From: "Paul W. Abrahams" <abrahams@v...>

• References:
  • XPointer and Sun patent
    • From: "Paul W. Abrahams" <abrahams@v...>

• Prev by Date: RDDL and entities (was Re: Schemas and entities (was"And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
• Next by Date: FW: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XPointer and Sun patent
• Next by thread: Re: XPointer and Sun patent
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread