• From: Jean-Marc VANEL <jmvanel@i...>
• To: 'Michael Smith' <smith@x...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:15:23 +0100

Michael Smith [mailto:smith@x...] writes:

> It would be good to have an ongoing discussion about criteria for
> editors, maybe eventually come up with an informal document describing
> expected application behavior, and rationale for why it's expected.

Not so complete as what Michael wants, but I put together a list of features
for editors.
I concentrated on the features rarely or nowhere available, but highly
desirable.
Free software developpers (and commercial products managers) should have a
look at this.

http://wwbota.free.fr/editor-spec.htm

I'm willing to maintain this sort of specification, so contributions
wellcome...

• Prev by Date: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Next by Date: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
• Previous by thread: Re: [RDDL] Cache / Security Model
• Next by thread: XML Integration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread