• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:36:33 -0500

Jonathan Borden wrote:


> HTML
> 
> should the nature be the URI of its specification?
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/

That would represent HTML 4.0, any DTD.

 
> or should the nature be the well-known URI of its content-type: text/html
> -- http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text/html

That would represent HTML generically, any version.

 
> or should the nature be something from the DOCTYPE e.g. strict.dtd?
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd

That would represent HTML 4.0 Strict.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for newRDDLnatures and purpose
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDL naturesand purpose
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
• Next by Date: Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the natureofHTML4.0?
• Next by thread: Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for newRDDLnatures and purpose
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread