• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 19:29:15 +0000 (GMT)

On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Paul Grosso wrote:

> At 12:05 2001 01 02 -0700, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> >Besides the other ideas I posted, I thought up "Namespace Gloss" or
> >"Resource Gloss".
> >
> >I don't like "* Discovery Directory" since the "discovery" seems
> >redundant given the "directory".  Looks like just a way to toss in a
> >buzzword now that DISCO is back in vogue, with new cousin UDDI.
> >
> >Other ideas: "Resource Charter", "Resource Summary", "Resource Outlay",
> >"Namespace Resource Directory" (has the requisite three words).
> 
> Since this thing is directing one to a bunch of potentially
> interesting and related resources, "resource directory" seems 
> the most natural to me (I can take or leave "discovery").

How about Resource Description File?

Dan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]]
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
    • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org)
• Next by Date: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Previous by thread: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Next by thread: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread