• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• To: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:40:50 +0000

Thanks for the support.

I've put links in to Relax, TREX and Schematron, though I they will have
their own FAQs.

I am wary of over-scoping the FAQ this early - as far as
implementation-specific issues go I would like to put in links to the
relevent "implement features" lists, though anything that *does* become
a fequently asked question should get its own mention - any suggestions?

Francis. 

Jeff Rafter wrote:
> 
> Francis,
> 
> What a great resource!  Thanks for posting that-- I can't remember how many
> times I have wanted to send someone to a FAQ for common easily answered
> questions.  The only additions I think I would like to see would be
> 
> 1) Other schema references (as per the recent discussions TREX, RELAX,
> SchemaTron?)
> 
> 2) More information on tools such as XSV, Oracle Schema Validator etc.  I
> know that there are links on the XML Schemas homepage but I think I am
> looking for the information that we always hear Henry say-- "that feature
> has not been implemented", "you won't be able to validate that without an
> instance"... etc.
> 
> Great job,
> Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
    • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
• Next by Date: Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
• Previous by thread: Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
• Next by thread: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread