• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>,Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@x...
• Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 14:41:35 -0600

In other words, a fine topic for gnashing until 
next Christmas.  Fantastic!  The semantic stuff 
was running out of firewood.  I noted that in 
Rick's article, he mentions in a comment that 
there is place for RDF.  

What would be the role of the RDF would 
in the XHTML schema?

Why was the section on XLinks not done?  Time 
or conceptual problems?

I think the XHTML Schema should be a top priority. 
Really, it might help XHTML become popular. :-)

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@m...]

In conclusion, an XML Schema version of m12n is at best extremely
experimental, and makes for a volatile subject. Please always keep in mind
that there are advantages *and* disadvantages. Personally, I have no
objections to it, and welcome any further improvements (in the "why not?"
manner), and may contribute further at a later date :-)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML m12n XSD
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
  • Re: XHTML m12n XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: XHTML m12n XSD
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML m12n XSD
• Previous by thread: RE: matching
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML m12n XSD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread