• From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 21:36:34 +0000

Remembering that my proposal is a melding of Jonathan and Tim's, I have
updated it to use a resource element instead of div:-
http://infomesh.net/xncl/
I believe that the semantics of <link> are too well known and used to just
ignore, so we're going to have to keep them, surely (then HTML processors
can be modified). Basically, it's the same proposal, I just changed div to
xncl:resource :-)
Jonathan: maybe it would be better if you just made these changes to your
proposal for continuity, but I still don't like the fact that:-
a. You don't use the XHTML namespace
b. You don't use xhtml:type when you could do.
Easily fixable of course!

Very good efforts everyone,
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code)
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code)
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code)
• Next by thread: RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread