• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:32:30 -0800

> You could do worse than Simon's XMLhack story on it:

Thanks Edd. I'm linking to your article on Scripting News and just ran a
quick DaveNet.

http://davenet.userland.com/2001/01/12/theW3cAPatentJakobNielsenAndSun

Dave

• References:
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@i...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
  • Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
  • Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
• Next by Date: Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
• Previous by thread: Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
• Next by thread: Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread